Studypool Homework Help - Qso 340 project 2 powerpoint (2024)

Showing Page:

1/8

Studypool Homework Help - Qso 340 project 2 powerpoint (1)

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up

Studypool Homework Help - Qso 340 project 2 powerpoint (2)

Showing Page:

2/8

Studypool Homework Help - Qso 340 project 2 powerpoint (3)

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up

Studypool Homework Help - Qso 340 project 2 powerpoint (4)

Showing Page:

3/8

Studypool Homework Help - Qso 340 project 2 powerpoint (5)

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up

Studypool Homework Help - Qso 340 project 2 powerpoint (6)

End of Preview - Want to read all 8 pages?

Access Now

Unformatted Attachment Preview

5-2 PROJECT STATUSREPORTQSO-340: Project TwoDaniel NicolarSouthern NewHampshire UniversityProject Goals and ObjectivesThe goal is of this project is to deliver a catered softwaresolution to allow for streamlined workflows and processes atXYZ Financial Services.Objectives:- The framework must be ABC Workflow v3.0- Three new features- Customization of the five existing features- Redesigned UITeamInformationScheduleStart Date – 3/2/20Expected Completion Date – 12/15/20MilestonesXYZ Business Workflow 1.0 Release – 8/24/20XYZ Business Workflow 1.1 Release – 12/15/20Gantt ChartRiskRegisterUpdated MilestonesXYZ Business Workflow 1.0 Release – 9/15/20XYZ Business Workflow 1.1 Release – 12/30/20Action ItemsBetter Time ManagementTask PrioritizationMeasure and track progress dailyName:Description:...
Purchase document to see full attachment

Studypool Homework Help - Qso 340 project 2 powerpoint (7)

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Honor CodeflagReport DMCA

Review

Review

Honor CodeflagReport DMCA

Studypool Homework Help - Qso 340 project 2 powerpoint (10)

Anonymous

Nice! Really impressed with the quality.

Studypool Homework Help - Qso 340 project 2 powerpoint (11)

Studypool

Studypool Homework Help - Qso 340 project 2 powerpoint (12)

4.7

Studypool Homework Help - Qso 340 project 2 powerpoint (13)

Indeed

Studypool Homework Help - Qso 340 project 2 powerpoint (14)

4.5

Studypool Homework Help - Qso 340 project 2 powerpoint (15)

Sitejabber

Studypool Homework Help - Qso 340 project 2 powerpoint (16)

4.4

24/7 Study Help

Stuck on a study question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basicmathto advanced rocket science!

Post question

Most Popular Study Documents

6 pages

Philosophy Business Ethics.edited The Ford Pinto scandal is presently part of the tale of the American culture. Pinto was a U.S.A subcompact car produced by ... Philosophy Business Ethics.edited The Ford Pinto scandal is presently part of the tale of the American culture. Pinto was a U.S.A subcompact car produced by the Ford Motor Company from ...

7 pages

Provide Nursing Care That Promotes And Supports Psychosocial Well Being Provide Nursing Care that Promotes and Supports Psychosocial Well-Being Integrate Principles of Leadership and Management ... Provide Nursing Care That Promotes And Supports Psychosocial Well Being Provide Nursing Care that Promotes and Supports Psychosocial Well-Being Integrate Principles of Leadership and Management to Promote and Support the ...

64 pages

Gate Fluid Mechanics Short Notes Gate Fluid Mechanics Short Notes
The Theory of Power Dynamics and Team Dysfunctionalities Case Study You will need tosubmit an individual case debrief and reflection report for each case whichoutlines the contextual sig ... The Theory of Power Dynamics and Team Dysfunctionalities Case Study You will need tosubmit an individual case debrief and reflection report for each case whichoutlines the contextual significance of the case as well as a reflection ofwhat you have learnt that could be applied to their future career (as a futurebusiness leader). Theoretical insight must be sourced from the same topic aswhere the case is found (hint: reflect on your responses from the questions forlearning). It is a maximum of 300 words per submission. You will only be givenone opportunity to submit. It is recommended to initially prepare and edit yoursubmission in a word document before pasting it into the online form. Noreferences required. You can write in first person (ie. I learnt that…). Foreach submission, you are required to submit three (3) paragraphs addressingthese questions (no need to include the questions, just number your answers):1. Analysis of the Case: What is the case about? 2. Analysis of the Case: Whatframeworks, theories or constructs assist in making sense of the case? How dothey do this? (1-2 only, describing how it enables analysis) 3. Reflection:What can you (personally) take away from the case that could be applied in yourfuture career (as a future business leader)?
MGMT 394 Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Crowdturfing Case Study Hello,Here are the instructions for this case study:As organizations increasingly collect massive amounts of customer data ... MGMT 394 Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Crowdturfing Case Study Hello,Here are the instructions for this case study:As organizations increasingly collect massive amounts of customer data, there are several ethical scenarios that have been reported and potential laws that may come into play. Research a recent unethical scenario, such as the crowdturfing campaigns described in the article, Unethical But Not Illegal: Uncovering the Persuasive Messages Leveraged by Providers of the "Real" Online Social Impressions (ECIS). (Links to an external site.) Write a 2-3 page analysis of this case study and describe your opinion of the ethical behavior within the case. Would any state security breach notification laws and international privacy laws need to be considered? Describe how key law enforcement agencies dedicated to combating cyber and physical threats could be involved.Here is the grading rubric:MGMT 394 2.3 Case Study RubricMGMT 394 2.3 Case Study RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification and Analysis of the Main Issues/Problem25.0 pts(Excellent - A) Identifies and understands all of the main issues in the case study. Insightful and thorough analysis of all the issues.23.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Identifies and understands most of the main issues in the case study. Thorough analysis of most of the issues.21.0 pts(Average - C) Identifies and understands some of the issues in the case study. Superficial analysis of some of the issues in the case.19.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Identifies and understands few of the issues in case study. Incomplete analysis of the issues.17.0 pts(Failing - F) Identifies and understands very little of the issues in case study. No analysis of the issues.25.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnswers to Case Study Questions20.0 pts(Excellent - A) Answers to case study questions are clear throughout. Connection with class and study material goes well beyond the obvious connections among ideas; demonstrates insight and original thinking.18.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Answers to case study questions present some irrelevant information on topic etc., but very little; treatment goes beyond obvious connections with class and study material.16.0 pts(Average - C) Answers to case study questions are vague in places; some irrelevant or distracting information.14.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Answers to case study questions are unclear and/or confusing. Treatment is very superficial; paper may be well written but says nothing.12.0 pts(Failing - F) Does not address the case study questions. Treatment is very superficial and says very little.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComments on effective solutions/strategies20.0 pts(Excellent - A) Well documented, reasoned, and pedagogically appropriate comments on solutions, or proposals for solutions, to all issues in the case study.18.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Appropriate, well thought out comments about solutions, or proposals for solutions, to most of the issues in the case study.16.0 pts(Average - C) Superficial and/or inappropriate solutions to some of the issues in the case study.14.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Little or no action suggested, and/or inappropriate solutions to all of the issues in the case study.12.0 pts(Failing - F) Provided no feasible solutions or strategies to the issues in the case study.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLinks to Course Readings and Additional Research20.0 pts(Excellent - A) Excellent research into the issues with clearly documented links to class (and/or outside) readings.18.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Good research and documented links to the material read.16.0 pts(Average - C) Limited research and documented links to any readings.14.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Incomplete research and links to any readings.12.0 pts(Failing - F) Provided no references or support of analysis.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle and Mechanics15.0 pts(Excellent - A) Chooses words for their precise meaning and uses an appropriate level of specificity. Sentence style fits audience and purpose. Sentences clearly structured and carefully focused. Almost entirely free of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors.12.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Generally uses words accurately and effectively, but may be too general. Sentences generally clear, structured, and focused, though some may be awkward or ineffective. May contain a few errors, which may annoy the reader but not impede understanding.10.0 pts(Average - C) Uses relatively vague and general words, may use some inappropriate language. Sentence’s structure generally correct, but sentences may be wordy, unfocused, repetitive, or confusing. Usually contains several mechanical errors, which may temporarily confuse the reader but not impede the overall understanding.8.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Tends to being vague and abstract, or very personal and specific. Usually contains several awkward or ungrammatical sentences; sentence structure is simple or monotonous. Usually contains either many mechanical errors or a few important errors that block the reader's understanding and ability to see connections between thoughts.6.0 pts(Failing - F) Misuse of words throughout. Awkward sentences throughout. Difficult to attach a thought process. Poorly punctuated, misspelled words, grammatically abusive.15.0 ptsTotal Points: 100.0

3 pages

Shakespeare William Shakespeare is undoubtedly one of the best writers the modern world era has witnessed. His ability to bring theatr ... Shakespeare William Shakespeare is undoubtedly one of the best writers the modern world era has witnessed. His ability to bring theatrical performance and written ...

View more

Similar Documents

CALUMS Professionalism and Social Media DiscussionSocial media plays a significant role in the lives of nurses in both their professional and personal lives. Additionally, ...Mercer How Have Feminist and Masculine Movements Shaped Our Culture Today Essaywatch and write a summary. 100 words THERE ARE 4 5) Write a documented essay on the topic; How have feminist and masculine...Rio Concepts in Strategic Management and Business, management homework helpResources: Riordan Virtual Organization, Concepts in Strategic Management and Business Policy, and Competitive Advantages ...
PSB 4004 The University of South Florida The Motor System DiscussionThe Motor SystemDescribe how a complex action (e.g. licking an ice cream cone) is assembled from component parts and chec...report about florida and what happened there . Also about the government act for the people there what happened there . Also about the government act for the people there ...ME 2580 Middle Tennessee State University Kinematics of a Particle QuestionsThere will be 4 questions and I will attache you all the questions for you. Please solve the questions step by step by usi...
Medicine powerpointComprehensive power points in gynecology, internal medicine, ophthalmology, pharmacology, etc...Infant Industry ArgumentThe infant industry argument is a popular theory that postulates the need and importance of protecting new industries and ...English...
Studypool Homework Help - Qso 340 project 2 powerpoint (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Nicola Considine CPA

Last Updated:

Views: 5443

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (69 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Nicola Considine CPA

Birthday: 1993-02-26

Address: 3809 Clinton Inlet, East Aleisha, UT 46318-2392

Phone: +2681424145499

Job: Government Technician

Hobby: Calligraphy, Lego building, Worldbuilding, Shooting, Bird watching, Shopping, Cooking

Introduction: My name is Nicola Considine CPA, I am a determined, witty, powerful, brainy, open, smiling, proud person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.